San Diego's Defensive Woes

Last July I wrote that the Chargers defense would appear to significantly decline in 2008, even with no change in skill or performance. The reason was that they could not possibly repeat their phenomenally high defensive interception rate. At the halfway mark this season, the Chargers evidently don't think they're doing very well because they just fired their defensive coordinator. But is the Chargers defense really that bad, or is it just unlucky?

Last season San Diego led the NFL with an insanely high 5.4% interception rate. That means they intercepted more than 1 out of every 20 passes attempted. But because defensive interceptions are almost completely random, I forecast that the overwhelming likelihood would be that their 2008 interception rate would be far closer to average. In fact, it's currently well below average at 2.2%. The average so far this year is 2.6%.

Using regression coefficients to weight the importance of each major efficiency stat, we can estimate that the difference in defensive interception rate from 2007 to '08 would cost San Diego 2.6 games over the course of a full season, or about 1.3 games so far this season.

Aside from their interceptions, the Chargers' pass defense is still above average but not as good as last year. So far in 2008, San Diego has allowed 6.2 net yards per attempt compared to an NFL average of 6.3. Last year, they allowed 5.7 net yards per attempt. On average, this would have cost them a difference of 0.8 wins over the course of a full season, or 0.4 wins so far.

Their defensive running efficiency is exactly the same at 4.2 yards per attempt. That's slightly worse than average, which is 4.1 yds per att.

In total, the Chargers interception rate (which is overwhelmingly random) accounts for an estimated 1.3 wins out of a total difference of 1.7, or about 75%.

So Ted Cotrell was fired as defensive coordinator for a drop-off of half a yard per pass attempt, or just less than half a win. The unfortunate loss of pass rusher Shawne Merriman to injury would easily account for such a difference. Now I'll make a new prediction. Because San Diego's interception rate has been so low this year, it's bound to improve (i.e. regress to the mean), and most people will think Cotrell's replacement, Ron Rivera, is to thank.

My point isn't that the Chargers have lost precisely 1.7 games fewer this year because of their defense. My main points are: 1) if you didn't buy how random defensive interceptions really are, maybe you'll reconsider; 2) Cotrell probably shouldn't have been fired; and 3) expect the Chargers defense to improve for the remainder of the year, if only because their interception rate is likely to improve.

  • Spread The Love
  • Digg This Post
  • Tweet This Post
  • Stumble This Post
  • Submit This Post To Delicious
  • Submit This Post To Reddit
  • Submit This Post To Mixx

8 Responses to “San Diego's Defensive Woes”

  1. Tarr says:

    I think the best way to explain defensive interceptions is that they happen on the margins, because the offensive game plan already takes into account the talent of the defense. That is, if a DB is terrible, there will be more passes thrown that way, and more passes thrown in places where a good DB would have a play. Conversely, great DBs like Nnamdi Asomugha or Champ Bailey simply see fewer balls thrown their way, and the passes that do come their way are often safe, shorter passes that are harder to pick off.

    That said, the .08 correlation that is left over, while quite small, may reflect a real and repeatable skill. You would obviously need a lot more data to prove that out, but my guess is that some corners, after adjusting for their general coverage and athletic talent, are better at hanging onto an errant pass. So while the opportunity and luck of having the QB throw a particular sort of inaccurate pass is the dominant factor, skill on the DB's part may play some role.

  2. Anonymous says:

    So statistically INTs are random, but does that mean that the better ranked defenses over the years do not generate more INTs than poor ones? Intuitively, INTs come from (apart from the random) great plays by DBs, and a pass rush that pressures the QB, even if they don't get to sack him.
    I know what your numbers say, but why, intuitively, do they not make sense? Not disagreeing, but a bit confused!
    Kind regards,

  3. Brian Burke says:

    Anon-When I say they're "random," I should be more precise. Really, I should say "they don't predict themselves well." In other words, having a high def int rate in the first half of the year does not mean a team will have a high rate in the 2nd half.

    I looked at exactly what you asked in this article. I tried predicting late season def int rate with other related stats from the early season. Def pass eff correlated at r=0.01, and sack rate correlated at r=0.08.

    Admittedly, sack rate is not equivalent to "pass rush." There are hurries and hits, etc. But we would expect some correlation between sacks and ints. But there isn't.

  4. Nick Mayhew says:

    okk, so sacks don't correlate well, but as we seem to be agreeing, pass rush / pressure (however you measure it) creates INTs, not a sack in itself, although one would think the two are linked i guess.

    anyway, i still think "good" defenses eg in yds per game or total points over a season will have higher INTs than "bad" ones.

    Surely this must be the case?

    Nick (again)

  5. Anonymous says:

    a better defense will have a higher underlying probability of making an interception, but this PR is something we never actually observe, we can only infer it from data. We'd expect a D with a .05 INT PR to intercept more passes than one with a .04 PR, but due to random variation this won't always be the case and so we might mistake the weaker defense for the stronger simply due to luck. I also think there are too many unknown variables at play to ever realistically model interceptions --> a ball that tips off a receiver's hands straight up in the air and is intercepted is the fault of the WR and pure luck to the DEF. This is probably as close to a random variable as you'll find in football. What are some others?

  6. Brian Burke says:

    Anon-Well put.

    Good defenses will generally get more total interceptions because opposing offenses are behind and are passing more often.

    I just tested another variable. I thought that a good run defense would make an offense more predictable and lead to a better interception rate. The (full-season) correlation between def YPC and def int rate is -0.08 (p=0.37), so not much connection there.

    On the offensive side, there is some consistency in int rate. It auto-correlates (within season) at 0.27. It's not a lot, but helps put interceptions in general in perspective--overwhelmingly random, but 'thrown' far more than 'taken.'

  7. Anonymous says:

    The chargers defensive stats are so poor this season because Merriman is out for one, and the refs are totally against the chargers almost every game

  8. Brian Burke says:

    No. The refs just love the Colts. That was obviously a fumble by Gonzalez.

    Merriman is a huge factor, obviously. But the Chargers D is doing almost as well in other categories, just not in ints.

Leave a Reply